🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue worked, and revealed recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Course

Araghchi is navigating a difficult course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader asserting the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions resume.

Trump in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the conference, intended to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of international law, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be settled by military means. He asserted the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith hard to rebuild.

Negotiations Continues the Final Resolution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to dictate their desires during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the ultimate resolution to address disagreements, but its criteria, regulations and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will receive a answer in the identical approach."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We acquired many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."