🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.